Treadmill Doctor’s Treadmill & Elliptical Review Comparison for 2009
When we started reviews in 1999, we felt that the other options on the market were lacking. Most of the reviews we read would be like the car magazines like Car & Driver only giving opinions on about 10 or 20 cars a year. Not only is the lack of comprehensive coverage a major failure, it completely eliminates their ability to have perspective on the market as a whole. Additionally, we started doing extensive travel several years ago to visit as many factories as possible. In the last few years, we traveled to Taiwan and visited all of the major treadmill and elliptical manufacturers and are going back in 2009. We originally said that if the publications would get better, we would quit rating machines but since we are now the authority on reviews, it doesn't make sense to stop doing them. Below you will find our comments on other ratings that are published either in print on online for the public. Read our history of reviews for more info on the progression of our reviews.
Considered the standard at the time we started reviewing machines, it quickly became apparent that their testing method did not have real-world application. CR has started to do a better job on their reviews but their perspective is still limited due to the small number of models. We understand that beginning 2 years ago, they sent out questionnaires to factories to make sure they didn't buy a bunch of discontinued machines but that helped them miss several great new offerings like the Epic at Costco and other new models. Prime example of their usual missteps is in recent year's ratings where they have the Lifefitness Essential FT6 as a best buy pick when Life had been trying to get rid of them on ebay for about ½ price and one FT6 customer from Anchorage emailed us asking for help dealing with the company because they were having problems getting it fixed after a blue flame shot out of the motor area when first plugged in. Interestingly, this is the same problem many Diamondback customers experienced with the 1200T which was made by the same factory in Taiwan that makes Life's Essential line. You would think someone reviewing treadmills would have known this. If you need another opinion, this is no longer a bad option. They are doing better than they did years ago but still have a long way to go.
Their 2006 ratings were an improvement but they further reduced the number of models tested. It helped that they asked our help in picking models for the last few years but we would have liked to see them include more models. The interesting component of their request for help was they wanted help with their model selection but refused help on their rating system which still needs some help. In the past, there were two interesting components to their reviews that stood out to us immediately. First was the use of acceleration as a method to help rate the machine. This was particularly amusing since anyone who knows treadmills knows that if you jump the speed input circuit on most machines, you can get the treadmill to full output and full belt speed in about a second or two. Acceleration is a component of software programming and many companies choose slow acceleration in order to keep the belt from knocking the user off the belt so it is a safety issue, not a quality issue. The other issue was the way they let people who use treadmills regularly be a key component of how a treadmill is rated. All of us here can change oil on a car and we all drive our cars everyday, but many of us don't know the first thing about the specific components of a car and how we should determine the quality of car componentry.
These are the kings of swallowing the line from any company. Based on inflated MSRP's of one distribution company that was having their models made by one of the largest private-label manufacturers, their models rated as best buys from this publication when the actual selling price was retail for comparable models made under different brand names. Just a quick search of who actually made the machine would have resulted in finding that this was the case, even if they didn't know the fitness business in general.
This site is always one of constant amusement. In general, the ratings are from people who have just bought a machine and are trying to convince other people to buy the same machine for whatever reason- buyer's remorse, need for confirmation, etc. We have seen other ratings on Epinions written by salespeople- some admit their jobs in the rating, and some people that we know have posted reviews extolling the merits of a treadmill that will simply put money into their pockets. This is an interesting concept but tread carefully there since there are some people who will say anything and the content is affected as a direct result.
Monster Ratings (and other treadmill sellers reviews)
We used to hear about these all the time but don't hear about them hardly at all any longer. People have figured out that the company selling the treadmills controls the reviews so you would expect their treadmills to rate as the best, which they commonly do.
A rather wicked phenomenon has popped up in the last couple of years where sites write reviews but then get paid for their recommendations when the sale is made. We know it is a stretch but let's think about this for a second?if a person is being paid only when a factory is making a sale, who do you think the reviewer is going to push? That's why you see so many sites favorably review models from Smooth and Sole (from what we understand, they pay the most at around 8% of the sale). We wish the factories would stop this practice and just build a good machine. As with a better mousetrap, if you build a better one, the world will beat a path to your door.